Could be B. wattsii, B. ambiguum or B. camfieldii. B. ambiguum seems the most likely, given that the pinnae reduce in length towards the base. A fertile frond would be necessary to ID it correctly.
Tricky, given the location . Could be B maximum. Doesn't look like B. cartilagineum, but just possibly could be B minus. Might not be in the ACT++ list
1,904,751 sightings of 21,315 species from 13,114 contributors CCA 3.0 | privacy
We acknowledge the Traditional Owners of this land and acknowledge their continuing connection to their culture. We pay our respects to their Elders past and present.